Teaching
Gender
Beginning early in their lives, children are introduced to gender roles: through characters’ actions in television shows and the books read to them, from what they observe in their own households, based on the toys they play with, their rewards and punishment, plus the way parents reinforce appropriate play (Putnam). It doesn’t take long to saturate. “Children have been observed to display toy preferences with gender stereotypes at 14 to 20 months of age” according to findings published in 2001 International Journal of Behavioral Development (Serbin). Another study, “Questioning Gender: A Sociological Exploration,” determined that learning to gender-type, a process wherein gender-specific behavior can be distinguished, occurs when children are between the ages of two-and-a- half and three (Ryle 131). Weinraub’s results from 1984, published in Child Development, determined that children between 2 and 4 years of age “become aware that there are two categories of people – male and female – and they also become aware of the category into which they fit…[they] discriminate individuals in one category from individuals in another” (1493). All these studies determined that children are aware of and make choices based on gender before the age of five.
Beginning early in their lives, children are introduced to gender roles: through characters’ actions in television shows and the books read to them, from what they observe in their own households, based on the toys they play with, their rewards and punishment, plus the way parents reinforce appropriate play (Putnam). It doesn’t take long to saturate. “Children have been observed to display toy preferences with gender stereotypes at 14 to 20 months of age” according to findings published in 2001 International Journal of Behavioral Development (Serbin). Another study, “Questioning Gender: A Sociological Exploration,” determined that learning to gender-type, a process wherein gender-specific behavior can be distinguished, occurs when children are between the ages of two-and-a- half and three (Ryle 131). Weinraub’s results from 1984, published in Child Development, determined that children between 2 and 4 years of age “become aware that there are two categories of people – male and female – and they also become aware of the category into which they fit…[they] discriminate individuals in one category from individuals in another” (1493). All these studies determined that children are aware of and make choices based on gender before the age of five.
The
Genderless Child
Both Sasha and Storm were raised without the conventional
notions of gender identity. Their
parents avoid gender determinants – by removing the factors which affect their
children’s learning about gender – eliminating distinctions or adherence to gender
norms. Even their biological sex was a closely
kept secret that their families did not reveal to anyone – only their midwives
knew for sure. Distinctly rigid ideas of gender would repress and limit them, their parents feared. Sasha’s mother was concerned that gender stereotyping would impair her child’s development by skewing his/her potential. Storm’s parents didn't want him/her to be limited by sex, instead to be able to choose whatever was comfortable later in life when s/he was prepared to make more informed choices. Storm’s parents sought freedom of expression, which they hoped would lead their child to being well-adjusted.
Sasha’s parents are considered odd – shunned by
other parents who do not understand them as well as criticized by family and
friends. Sasha, who had not been bullied
for wearing girl’s clothing, appeared at-ease in the photographs. However, the article about how Storm was
being raised described his/her family’s life as the “outlandish world of gender-free parenting” (Leonard). Obviously, this author was jaundiced in his
outlook and reporting of the story.
In addition, experts in the field were disparaging. In the article about Storm’s upbringing, a child psychiatrist frowned on gender-neutrality with this disapproving remark, “To raise a child not as a boy or a girl is creating, in some sense, a freak. It sets them up for not knowing who they are” (Leonard). In both articles, identical experts' comments were published regarding an environment free from gender norms. First, a child psychiatrist expressed dismay insisting that “When children are born, they’re not a blank slate. We do have male brains and female brains. There’s a reason why boys do more rough and tumble play; there’s a reason why girls have better language development skills” (Wilkes and Leonard). Then, a noncommittal observation of a psychology lecturer appeared in both articles, maintaining that, “It’s hard to say whether being raised gender-neutral will have any immediate or long-term psychological consequences for a child, purely because to date there is little research examining this topic” (Wilkes and Leonard).
Breaking the Gender Barrier
In addition, experts in the field were disparaging. In the article about Storm’s upbringing, a child psychiatrist frowned on gender-neutrality with this disapproving remark, “To raise a child not as a boy or a girl is creating, in some sense, a freak. It sets them up for not knowing who they are” (Leonard). In both articles, identical experts' comments were published regarding an environment free from gender norms. First, a child psychiatrist expressed dismay insisting that “When children are born, they’re not a blank slate. We do have male brains and female brains. There’s a reason why boys do more rough and tumble play; there’s a reason why girls have better language development skills” (Wilkes and Leonard). Then, a noncommittal observation of a psychology lecturer appeared in both articles, maintaining that, “It’s hard to say whether being raised gender-neutral will have any immediate or long-term psychological consequences for a child, purely because to date there is little research examining this topic” (Wilkes and Leonard).
Breaking the Gender Barrier
I would be
concerned about the negative impact of raising a child without gender –
specifically because it strikes at the core of what is normal. It’s extremely difficult to transgress
society’s rules for behavior, and a person has to be uniquely stable and
confident to withstand the onslaught of contempt for being different. So, while I see the parent’s arguments that
gender is limiting, it is also a major factor for societal expectations. I could not see myself being bold enough to set
my child up for the punishment that goes along with breaking society’s
rules.
However, I give Sasha’s and Storm’s
parents a great deal of credit for following their beliefs, forging ahead
despite controversy, and seeing through their convictions – because their
confidence will likely fuel Sasha and Storm to persevere in the upheaval of
classmates and peers who will no doubt find their upbringing unusual and fodder
for teasing. Everyone else whom Sasha
and Storm will encounter will have opinions that are contrary to the way they
were raised. These kids will bear the brunt
of being different.
Having
said that, there’s always someone who has to be the role model for change – and
that person’s path is clearly fraught with controversy. I think of Jackie Robinson, who was the first
African American to play baseball in the non-Negro leagues. He too was looked upon for breaking
stereotypes. His role was to show that society was better served by eliminating
racial bias. He endured the social
reaction of being different. He “broke
the color barrier” that had restricted black players to Negro leagues. Sasha’s and Storm’s parents are like Branch
Rickey, the baseball executive credited with bringing Jackie Robinson to the Brooklyn
Dodgers; these parents are showing us that there is a “gender barrier” and that
it needs to be broken.
Works Cited
“Canadian Parents Raise Gender-Neutral Baby by Not Revealing Its
Sex.” AutoStraddle. 24 May 2011. Web. 17 April 2015. http://www.autostraddle.com/canadian-parents-raise-gender-neutral-baby-by-not-revealing-its-sex-90186/
Leonard,
Tom. “The Baby who is Neither Boy nor Girl: As gender experiment provokes
outrage, what about the poor child's future?” Daily
Mail. 27 May 2011 Web. 17 April 2015.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1391772/Storm-Stocker-As-gender-experiment-provokes-outrage-poor-childs-future.html
Putnam,
Jodi. “Influences on Children’s Development.”
Purdue. N.d. Web. 17 April
2015. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/providerparent/child%20growth-development/influencesongender.htm
Ryle,
Robyn. Questioning Gender: A Sociological Exploration. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 2012.
Print.
Serbin,
Lisa, et al. “Gender Stereotyping in Infancy:
Visual Preferences for and Knowledge of Gender-Stereotyped Toys in the
Second Year.” International Journal of Behavioral Development. 25(1) 7-15. 2001.Web.
17 April 2015.
Weinraub,
Marsha, et al. “The Development of Sex
Role Stereotypes in the Third Year: Relationships to Gender Labeling, Gender
Identity, Sex-Typed Toy Preference, and Family Characteristics.” Child
Development. Vol. 55, No. 4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. August 1984. Pp. 1493-1503. Web. 17 April 2015.
Wilkes,
David. “Boy or girl? The parents who refused to say for FIVE years finally
reveal sex of their 'gender-neutral' child.” Daily Mail. 20 January 2012. Web.
17 April 2015. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2089474/Beck-Laxton-Kieran-Cooper-reveal-sex-gender-neutral-child-Sasha.html
No comments:
Post a Comment